It may turn around, but it is a long shot. Â It looks like Romney won the popular vote, and Obama the Electoral College. Â I may have to rethink the electoral college. Â It saved us with Bush last time, and hurt this time.
(Later: Â Nope, Romney didn’t get the popular vote from what I see, so the electoral college, needs some change, but I think it is still a good idea. Â I do have a few choice words to say tot he Libertarians who allowed Testor to stay in the Senatae and the Democrat to take the Governorship. Â The difference between the Democrat and the Republican was smaller the the Libertarian canidates total in both races. Â That is how Testor won six years ago, too: he got more votes than Burns, but not as many as Burns plus the guy running to the right of him.)
I think the Electoral College should be by Congressional districts, not whole states. Â I don’t think the founders considered the idea that one state (California) would have 55 votes (over 1/6 the total needed of 270) and would be deadlocked for one party only. Â Maybe it should be LA as one block, San Francisco as one, and northern CA as one and southern CA as one. Â As it is the one party can count on CA as 1/6 of the EC votes needed by getting one single vote more than the other party. Â Not hard to do with the populations centers of LA and SF. leaving the rest of the state, with a lot of opposing views, out in the cold.
***
We all need to pray for our Country. Â There are very trying times ahead.
***
~Curtis, still hoping, in /\/\onTana! {=-{<
Post a Comment